face and pretended to check it over before handing it to Ed. âThis contains a statement by Lou Daniels, the artist whose drawings are in this room,â she said. âYou might recall discussing him at our last meeting. Heâs the young rebel graphic artist from San Franciscoâthis is his first show on the East Coast. Natalie and I are especially excited about introducing him to a wide, general audience through the Artistic Response to the Environment exhibit.â
Talking quickly, she told him about the artist on exhibition in the two smaller rooms. âIf youâll excuse me for a moment, Iâll go in the back and get a copy of his promo sheet and price list. There have been more people than usual through here the past few days, and the stack seems to have evaporated.â The exhibition space occupied 1,500 square feet, and Jana was grateful for every blessed inch of it. She let Ed look around alone, taking longer than necessary to gather the information she needed. By the time heâd finished looking at Louâs work, she was able to thrust the vitae on the other artist into his hands and busy herself with paperwork at her desk.
Out of the corner of her eye, she watched Ed survey Lou Danielsâ work from room-center, then begin a closer inspection. Even from behind, she could tell his reaction was the same as that of others seeing Louâs work for the first time. Initially his drawings appear to be architectural blueprints, pencil lines on grid paper. Then it would dawn on the viewer that these blueprints werenât for buildings; they were for landscapes, with plans for trees, birds, bushes, broken fences. The one Ed was studying now included wind circling one tree and shadows running off the left side of the page.
His interest in the drawings reassured Jana that sheâd been making too much of his attentiveness to her in the car. âIâll bet heâs envisioning Louâs work fitting into APLâs concept of the Artistic Response to the Environment exhibition,â Jana guessed. Even though sheâd described the artist as a ârebel,â these drawings didnât shock or offend; there were no nuclear explosions, no radioactive waste dumps. Their original exhibition proposal had included five pages of biographical material about the artists they planned to include, carefully outlining the content of their work and conveying to APL the message that overtly provocative imagery would be carefully avoided, but Jana was delighted to see Ed further reassured by this walk-through.
He took a quick look at the smaller rooms, then eased his way over to Janaâs desk. âIâm impressed,â he said.
âWell, thatâs good.â
âWhich of these two artists do you prefer? Give me your personal opinion.â
But this wasnât a personal visit: he was a grants officer for a major corporation, and she wanted to keep a professional veneer to the conversation. âI like them both, but for different reasons.â Jana barely looked up from her papers, for a moment feeling out of place in her own gallery. She shifted her pen from one hand to the other. Ed patiently waited for her to continue. âLouâs work features a minutely detailed exploration of space. His concentration on depth and perspective makes him perfect for the Central Park boat house, where the windows will add a further dimension. Iâve overheard viewers comment that they want to crawl inside some of his mazes and wander around in them.â To be honest, she found his drawings cold and intellectual, but it was easier for her to talk shop than to think about being alone in the gallery with a man.
âWe have some brochures around from Louâs other shows, if you want me to hunt for them,â she continued, getting to her feet as she was talking. âA review appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle that I found extremely perceptive.â Lou Daniels was