momentum, and soon
Time
magazine warned that âif Sadlowski does become the Steelworkersâ chief, both the economy and the climate of the nationâs laborâmanagement relations could be significantly affected.â One company executive told a reporter that if Sadlowski was elected âit would be a whole new ballgame.â (The executive also tipped his hat to Sadlowski, saying âHe was far and away the ablest union guy who has come down this pikeâdedicated, tireless, and honest.â ) Profiles of Sadlowski appeared in
Rolling Stone
and
The New York Times Magazine
. He gave an interview to
Penthouse
and appeared on
Meet the Press.
He became the darling of the left; Richard Goodwin and the television producer Norman Lear held fund-raisers for him. Geoghegan, in his marvelous book
Which Side Are You On?,
wrote
,
âItâs hard to believe now, but in 1976 this was a big story.â Bigger for some, Geoghegan recounts, than the presidential election that year, between Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford. Sadlowski became a modern-day paradox, a working-class hero in a country that doesnât think it has classes.
When the old guard accused Sadlowski of being a communist dupe, he told a
New York Times
writer: âYou can make it sound like any kind of revolutionary rhetoric you want but the fact is itâs the working class versus the coupon clipper. The boss is there for one damn purpose alone, and that is to make money, not to make steel, and itâs going to come out of the workerâs back. . . . I guess maybe Iâm a romantic, but I look on the American labor movement as a holy crusade, which should be the dominant force in this country to fight for the workingman and the underdog and make this a more just society.â
Sadlowski tapped a deep vein of worker discontent, and so faced deep hostility from the opposition. One Sadlowski supporter at a steelworkersâ convention was beaten up by three old-line unionists. Another, while pamphleteering outside a Houston factory, was shot in the neck. (Marlene says the supporter resembled her husband from behind, and she believes that thatâs who they thought they were shooting.) In the end, Sadlowski lost the election, garnering forty-four percent of the vote. In hindsight, some say he should have waitedâuntil he was older, until his politics had mellowed, until the world caught up with him. But Sadlowski was impatient, and not without reason, since he saw what was coming in Americaâs heartland, a dismantling of peopleâs livelihoods.
It wasnât easy for Sadlowski after the loss. He spent the next fifteen years working in various union staff jobs, and for some of that time drinking too much. (âI drank everything,â he says.) âIn the end,â a friend observed, âhe had to answer to guys who in every way were his inferiors, ham-and-egg guys, guys who shouldâve been glad to hold his overcoat. They couldnât get rid of him, but they reduced him.â He retired from the union in 1992, the same year that U. S. Steel shuttered South Works, where he had begun. But Sadlowski has brushed himself off and started again. He has stopped drinking and is now involved with labor and with his community in a new capacity, as a guardian of their histories.
Â
A couple of years ago, our mutual friend Tony Judge suggested that I spend a day with Sadlowski. Tony, a kind of intellectual entrepreneur, is connected to just about everyone in the city, and once a year, the two men drive around Chicago and visit sites that mean something to Sadlowski, like the gravesite of Allan Pinkerton, whose Pinkerton guards were frequently used to break strikes. Sadlowski, Tony told me, likes to urinate on Pinkertonâs grave. âHe sees the lineage stuff,â Tony says. âThe old grudges are his grudges.â So, with Tonyâs introduction, I called Sadlowski, who growled and grumbled, and grudgingly