before.
Different people.
Different values.
Different tastes â¦
So very true.
Once you come to realise
itâs just a matter of what people say,
that really ârightâ and âwrongâ are only words
and have such varied meanings â¦
Well, many aspects that once bothered me
now seem quite ordinary.
No, Gretel, if youâve finished dusting,
now you can sweep the floor.
Itâs very bad, the way some parents
treat their offspring.
Thereâs animals that care far better
for their young than many humans do.
But then,
letâs face it, weâre all animals.
Just different breeds of living species,
thatâs the truth of it.
I know that there are people
who wonât eat the flesh of animals.
A special virtue?
Yet vegetarianism takes so many forms.
Iâve made it quite a field of expertise.
Thereâs ovo, lacto, and thereâs veganism;
thereâs some who are fruitarians,
or even pescetarians ⦠it shows you
that it takes all sorts to make a world.
Canât really understand just why
the family dog or cat in some societies
is held as quite forbidden fodder
while others see these as a tasty treat.
Youâre following my reasoning?
The whole thingâs cultural. Depends entirely
on the way that youâve been reared.
I think a lot about these things. Iâve had
the time to contemplate the strangeness
of it all.
Taboo! Itâs curious â
the way what in one age
or one society seems normal,
part of daily life,
in others may be frowned on â¦
We make the rules,
and then pretend that theyâre god-given.
What presumption!
The floorâs swept? Mop it next,
and then you can make lunch for Hansel.
For me the most important thing
is to keep others happy.
Sheer misery â some childrenâs lives.
The happiness I bring them
is worth the price they pay.
I wonât pretend itâs altruistic,
but here at least they get a time of pleasure
that theyâve never known before.
Warriors in ancient races
took advantage of the enemies
theyâd slaughtered â
scavenged bodies
for new strength.
Today the Korowai are remnants of the many
through the ages who have known
that flesh brings strength â no matter what
its source â especially when it comes
from those who have proved weaker.
(Thatâs not what Iâm about!)
Eat more meat? So advertisers trumpet,
And dieticians tell us frequently:
Red meat is good for us â itâs iron for the blood.
Then what about straight need?
Consider history: sieges where,
in desperation and starvation,
to survive one fed from any source.
The faint of heart, or those too squeamish,
raise hands to lips in horror at the thought.
We realists say one does what one has to.
Plane wrecks.
Survivors of Flight 571
managed to obliterate taboos
and emulate those on the raft of the Medusa
or at the Siege of Leningrad.
They ate what was available.
They had to.
Had to? An interesting thought.
We all have different needs,
and different ways of meeting them.
Anthropophagy â
quite a word. It sounds more scientific
than a term like âcannibalâ.
We all know well, what science can explain
is more acceptable than grosser concepts â¦
No more apologies.
There are good precedents for how I live.
And how I satisfy my needs.
Iâm not the first to see the logic of these arguments.
In times gone by I read how Swift,
yes Jonathan himself,
the one we think of when we mention Gulliver,
created a solution to Irelandâs over-population crisis.
Quite logical â
just think of all those surplus children!
I could have cheered â until they pointed out to me
that he was known for irony. A pity, that!
Perhaps you have no stomach for considerations
of this sort ⦠a bad pun, Iâll admit! But note â
the flesh should be a tender young oneâs,
nothing old or stringy.
In my experience,