Jasmine Barber as a
fellow practitioner. They were on friendly terms and Dr Barber now looked awkward,
finding it hard to meet Frieda’s eyes. The third member of the team was a squat,
grey-haired woman in a violently pink jumper who was wearing a neck brace. Above it, her
wrinkled face was shrewd and her grey eyes bright. Frieda thought she looked like an
intelligent frog. She introduced herself as Thelma Scott. Frieda felt a tremor of
interest: she had heard of Thelma Scott as a specialist in memory and trauma, but had
never before met her. The only other person in the room sat at the far end of the table:
she was there to take notes of the proceedings.
‘As you know, Dr Klein,’ said
Professor Krull, glancing down at the sheets of paper in front of him, ‘this is a
preliminary investigation into a complaint we have received.’ Frieda nodded.
‘We have a code of ethics and a complaints procedure to which as a registrant you
have subscribed. Weare here today to investigate the complaint against
you and to make sure that one of your patients has not been a victim of poor
professional practice, and that you have behaved in a safe and appropriate manner.
Before we begin, I need to make clear that none of our decisions or findings have the
force of law.’ He was reading from the paper in front of him now. ‘Moreover,
whatever we decide does not affect the right of the individual making the complaint to
take legal proceedings against you, should they choose to do so. Do you
understand?’
‘Yes, I do,’ said Frieda.
‘Also, this screening committee is
made up of three psychotherapists who are here to give impartial professional
consideration to the case. Have you any reason for doubting the impartiality of any of
us, Dr Klein?’
‘No.’
‘You have chosen to have no
representation.’
‘That’s right.’
‘Then we can begin. The complaint has
been made by Mrs Caroline Dekker, on behalf of her husband Alan Dekker. You can confirm
that Alan Dekker was your patient?’
‘Yes. I saw him in November and
December 2009. I’ve written the dates of each session down.’ She brought out
a typed sheet and slid it across the table.
‘Mrs Dekker claims that her husband
came to see you in a state of acute distress.’
‘He was experiencing severe panic
attacks.’
‘She also claims that, far from
helping him, you used him as a –’ Krull looked down at his notes ‘– pawn in
a police investigation. That you acted like a detective, not a therapist, casting
suspicion on him, and indeed reported him to the police, making him a suspect in a case
of child abduction, that you violated your pledge of patient confidentiality andfurthered your own career at the expense of his peace of mind and
future happiness.’
‘Would you like to give us your
version of events, Dr Klein?’ Thelma Scott, the elderly woman in the neck brace
and ugly jumper, fixed Frieda with her sharp eyes.
Now that this moment, which she had long
dreaded, had at last arrived she felt calm. ‘Alan Dekker came to me in November
because he was tormented by fantasies of having a child. He was childless himself,
although he and his wife had been trying for some time to have a baby. So we talked
about why his childlessness should cause not just grief but severe dysfunction. At the
same time an actual child, Matthew Faraday, had disappeared. The child that Alan
described – the one he had never had – was so like the boy who had disappeared that I
felt I had to report it to the police. And then I told Alan what I’d
done.’
‘Was he angry?’ asked Jasmine
Barber.
Frieda thought for a moment. ‘He
seemed understanding, maybe even too much so. He found it hard to express anger. I found
him to be a gentle, self-doubting kind of man. Carrie – Mrs Dekker – was angry on his
behalf. She was very protective of him. It doesn’t surprise me that