rise to power of the people (the dēmos ) in the city. Even after the ostracism of this dangerous rival, in 443 B.C., Pericles
was assailed by virulent criticisms, as is testified by the attacks launched, in the
course of the 430s, against several of those close to him—namely, Anaxagoras the philosopher;
Aspasia, Pericles’ partner; and the sculptor Phidias.
The mark that Pericles made upon the city was nevertheless undeniable. In the first
place, it was he who pressed for the most prestigious magistracies to be open even
to the most poverty-stricken of the citizens; next, thecensus disqualifications that had been established at the beginning of the sixth century
were progressively removed, although access to the post of archon continued to be
denied to the thetes. It was also thanks to Pericles’ initiative that pay, in the
form of misthoi , was for the first time introduced as remuneration for taking part in civic life.
By the end of the 450s, the juries serving in Athenian courts were reimbursed so that
the least wealthy citizens could be in a position to serve in lawsuits without fear
of losing a day’s wages. From being purely a formality, democracy gradually became
a reality. Meanwhile, Pericles initiated a policy of major public works, the building
of the Parthenon between 447 and 438 B.C. being its most dazzling manifestation; and,
finally, he completed the construction of the Long Walls that linked the town to its
port, Piraeus, and also built a war-fleet, to the great advantage of the thetes, who
manned the triremes and received a wage for this. In this respect, internal democratization
and external imperialism kept in step as they developed.
So it was by no means by chance that Pericles also became a passionate defender of
Athenian interests within the Delian League. In, at the latest, 454 B.C., at the height
of its influence, the federal treasury was transferred to the Acropolis. Now the Athenians
could draw on it as they wished, in order to finance the functioning of their democracy.
But among their allies, these developments gave rise to discontent that was all the
more fervent given that the Persian peril had been dispelled as early as the 460s.
With the swearing of the Peace of Callias in 449 B.C., the situation became critical.
This treaty drew a final line under the confrontation that began with the Persian
Wars, thereby rendering the maintenance of the Delian League pointless. However, Athens
refused to dissolve this alliance, from which it acquired substantial profits; and
Pericles had no compunction about putting down the uprisings that followed, in Euboea
in 446 B.C. and then a long war against Samos, which lasted from 441 to 439.
Meanwhile, over and above these sporadic revolts, the democratic city had to cope
with the growing hostility of Sparta and its Peloponnesian allies. Alarmed by Athens’s
rise to power, the Spartans headed an alliance designed to counter its influence.
After a series of clashes between their respective allies, followed by a brief interlude
of calm—the “Thirty Years’ Peace” of 446 B.C.—tensions rose again until, in 431 B.C.,
the conflict erupted openly. This was the start of the Peloponnesian War. It was to
last for twenty-seven years and end in the defeat of Athens in 404 B.C. It was Pericles
who elaborated the strategy that, during the early years, made it possible for the
Athenians to resist the Peloponnesians despite the latter’s numerical superiority
and their redoubtable infantry. Thanks to their own superiority at seaand their impregnable defense system, the Athenians even appeared to be in a good
position to triumph. But from 430 onward, a serious “plague” ravaged the city, and
one year later Pericles was dead, carried off by this scourge.
Those few milestones trace a complex biographical path, the subtle twists and turns
of which it is hard to pinpoint. The fact is