pays respect to such absurdities as this farewell to the renowned Georgi Dimitrov: âWe promise to guard like the pupils of our eyes our maritime border for the successful building of socialism in our beloved Motherland.â Here we could almost be in Tijuanaâs fake bell tower. Kenarov remarks that âthe eternal border between the upper world and the underworld, the city and the cemetery, has disappeared in Bulgaria. No one is truly dead without a necrologue, and yet necrologues are meant to keep the dead alive.â So it is with Burton and Emerson, Dark Continents and Chernobyl. (As Pink Floyd said: âMatter of fact, itâs all dark.â) This ambiguity, or whatever you want to call it, shines out at us in Pico Iyerâs account of Varanasi, where Shiva met Vishnuâwhat could be more emblematic than that? Hence the Ganges with its thirty sewers: âBathe yourself in its filthy waters . . . and you purify yourself for life.â Wandering among sadhus who âwant to live in a world of ash,â Iyer concludes: âSpirituality in Varanasi lies precisely in the poverty and sickness and death that it weaves into its unending tapestry; a place of holiness, it says, is . . . a place where purity and filth, anarchy and ritual, unquenchable vitality and the constant imminence of death all flow together.â Here too he experiences a turning-backward epiphany not unlike that of Gorra in the Parisian repertory theater: Varanasi comes to remind him of his twisting-laned birthplace, Oxford.
Lynn Freedâs mini-memoir of the approaching end of apartheid in South Africa is of the highest order, not only for its style but also for its very profound meditation on fear in relation to political change. In his essay, Kenarov references the Bulgarian sociologist Emiliya Karaboeva, who seeks to classify what most recurs in necrologues. She concludes: âThe key words are love, pain, and sorrow, but the most important one is love.â In Freedâs brief vignette the love of what is endangered is implicit: this family, this home which may someday be invaded by killers, this life.
In every anthology of travel writing there should always be a hot-and-miserable piece bookended by a cold-and-miserable one. This year the first is furnished by Luke Dittrich, who shares with us the first installment of his walk along the Mexican-American border. Like many wise journalists, he has provisioned himself with a stroller full of water. Although the voracious mouthparts of copy editors have gnawed random holes in his narrative in obedience to their commercial instincts (I know this area somewhat, and was saddened by the deletion of localities that I know that Dittrich must have passed through), what remains is a pleasing read. His encounters with smiling or poker-faced Border Patrol agents are always an entertainment.
So much for hot. For cold, I give you Mark Jenkinsâs skiing trek with his brother through Norwayâs Hardangervidda National Park. Roald Amundsen, who as you probably know led the first successful expedition to the South Pole, tried twice to cross Hardangervidda. Each try almost killed him. Just as Amundsenâs own organizational excellence and modest understatement damaged him in comparison to the dead hero Scott, so Jenkinsâs account (which also shows certain signs of editorial damage) first struck me as less impressive than his accomplishment. But as I thought over that chilly escapade, I grew increasingly glad not to have accompanied the cheerful Jenkins brothers. Although they had the benefit of those newfangled trekking huts, the headwinds and whiteouts described in this story could easily have been fatal. The Jenkins brothers are obviously fine orienteers and in excellent shape. I salute them.
During this same year, Mark Jenkins (are there two of him, or is he just busy?) also managed to spelunk through the beautiful world of Vietnamâs Hang Son